乾隆帝 Qianlong Emperor mark and period (1736-1795), Chinese copper red porcelain dragon vase, Qing dynasty, Jingdezhen ware, A globular form Chinese porcelain vase, having five-toed Dragons amongst Lotus Blossoms and a scrolled foliate. Stylized Waves at rim. Blue double rings at foot & rim. Underside bears a blue Qianlong (1736-1795) mark. Imperial reign mark: Da Qing Qian Longi nian zhi. (Made during the Qianlong period of the Great Qing dynasty), in a double circle, underglaze blue. Height: 12.25 inches = 31.1 cm; Diameter: 9 inches = 22.9 cm; Weight: 6 lb. 3.1 oz. = 2,811 kg = 2 kg 811 g. Provenance: private collection in St. Petersburg, Florida, USA. Microscopic photos x50 shows microscopic gas microbubbles of different sizes, which proves ancient technology of porcelain production. That corresponds to 250 years old porcelain. Similar vase sold on Sotheby’s on October 25th, 2015: Lot 49. A rare copper-red 'Dragon and Phoenix' vase, Qing dynasty, Qianlong period (1736-1795). Estimate 80,000 — 120,000 GBP. Lot sold 100,000 GBP. Photo Sotheby's. https://www.alaintruong.com/archives/2015/10/25/32829454.html General Information on Microscopic Identification For a long time since the beginning, identification of ancient ceramics are only using traditional eye view method. But in recent years, with the help of science and technology, porcelain imitation level rise at an alarming level, and the traditional identification method is facing severe challenges. Today, to catch up with the rise of imitation, there are many methods surfaced for dating authenticity, and mostly are done in laboratory. All have different advantages and disadvantages. One of the cheapest method and can be done instantly and easily is through microscopic identification of bubbles. With just a good portable microscope with 60x magnification (recommended) or 200x magnification if you want to pin point, the world of microscopic phenomena reveals. Porcelain, after hundreds of years, changes occur and will certainly leave marks/traces on the inside of the glaze, and these marks/traces that we can perceive, can not be copied. Make up can only conceal the external. However, no matter how good the makeup artist is, still powerless if comes for internal substantive. It is known that varies of bubble size, layer, number, layout and color intensity, not only can give a good assistance to distinguish a genuine artifact from revival copy or a modern, but also can roughly determine various periods. Like for example, generally accepted conclusions, most Yongle (1403-1424) porcelain is characterized by 'large, medium and small bubbles in mixed layout' or Ru (1086-1106) is characterized by ‘very few bubbles’. Bubbles are present in all antique Chinese porcelain and the size, layout and number of the bubble varied greatly depending on the period the item was produced. It is correlated with the composition of the paste and glaze, moreover, composition of the paste usually has microscopic minerals in it like copper or iron which will oxidized further in the prolong of time and this morphing sometimes can be seen inside the glaze too. It is also correlated with pigments used for the decoration and the thickness of it. However, the different forms of fuel affecting bubble the most. As we know, several forms of fuel have been used for firing, like wood, coal, gas and electric. Wood fired was the most difficult in maintaining the ideal temperature. Since it was not easy to control, fluctuation always occur, therefore in most wood fuel, the bubbles varied greatly in sizes and very sparsely and unevenly layout. Halos sometimes can be seen on some bubble as well as wrinkles and flashing on the glaze surface. On the other hand with gas fired, because of well controlled temperature and using industrial made paste, the bubbles are incredibly tiny and very uniform in sizes and layout. The bubbles are even tinier, almost unseen, and more uniform if fired with electric.